ring my bells
Wish I could have one of these for an engagement ring instead of a boring diamond solitaire ring.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f45/70f457a4a6504ad00b57a6a5c040e484aeb969c0" alt=""
(Hell, wish I could have one of these, anytime, wedding or not.) This one is a diamond and sapphire piece from the ever-so-lovely Art Deco period. I love blue sapphires, especially when they're in this midnight blue hue.
This one has a vaguely rock 'n' roll vibe -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e9fb/1e9fbc41fec061040d626fd1509418893eb2ea8e" alt=""
I think it's the setting - it's silver rather than platinum, and it looks heavier. Would go quite well with my Yoko Ono-style Chanel couture wedding dress, hahaha.
This one, incredibly enough, is from 1770 -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89703/89703773a3e4555c6f077b92f775e68a5fbbed48" alt=""
It doesn't look antiquated at all - the design is almost sleek. I don't usually like diamonds set in gold but this one is an exception.
This 1920s piece features a diamond in the famous Asscher cut -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baa9d/baa9d4e186383b02c722c870fa3292b854c269ce" alt=""
It's like looking into a house of mirrors, all the angles of the diamonds squaring off nicely.
I like this 1930s piece for sheer prettiness alone -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27e48/27e485203e72456ecbf720cd31508223039cab3d" alt=""
The soft floral design kind of sets off the simplicity of the round stone in the middle.
That was fun wasn't it? I just love how you can drool for free at SJ Phillips.
Pictures from sjphillips.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f45/70f457a4a6504ad00b57a6a5c040e484aeb969c0" alt=""
(Hell, wish I could have one of these, anytime, wedding or not.) This one is a diamond and sapphire piece from the ever-so-lovely Art Deco period. I love blue sapphires, especially when they're in this midnight blue hue.
This one has a vaguely rock 'n' roll vibe -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e9fb/1e9fbc41fec061040d626fd1509418893eb2ea8e" alt=""
I think it's the setting - it's silver rather than platinum, and it looks heavier. Would go quite well with my Yoko Ono-style Chanel couture wedding dress, hahaha.
This one, incredibly enough, is from 1770 -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89703/89703773a3e4555c6f077b92f775e68a5fbbed48" alt=""
It doesn't look antiquated at all - the design is almost sleek. I don't usually like diamonds set in gold but this one is an exception.
This 1920s piece features a diamond in the famous Asscher cut -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baa9d/baa9d4e186383b02c722c870fa3292b854c269ce" alt=""
It's like looking into a house of mirrors, all the angles of the diamonds squaring off nicely.
I like this 1930s piece for sheer prettiness alone -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27e48/27e485203e72456ecbf720cd31508223039cab3d" alt=""
The soft floral design kind of sets off the simplicity of the round stone in the middle.
That was fun wasn't it? I just love how you can drool for free at SJ Phillips.
Pictures from sjphillips.com
Comments
max@sjphillips.com