the wedding march
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69ec2/69ec283cd53ce74a0d64b43e3dec40d1db72bfc8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec4bf/ec4bf53e2a6b30f311d2226cfbe17298de87fbb8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/369da/369dafd75de12d6e2a41069c4326094a9163f1b6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b55db/b55db88e1e16e5d7697ca9e77e8d40707bc3446c" alt=""
I know this makes me sound tragically shallow, but I truly believe these dresses are worth getting married for. Alber Elbaz's quartet of wedding dresses in his resort collection for Lanvin convinced me of a few things - a) cream is better than white; b) short is cooler than long, and no less classic c) streamlined is better than poofy ball skirts; d) but long skirts are okay if they're delicately tiered and worn with a fragile blouse. Oh, and veils make anything look wedding-y, so a killer veil is probably more important than a killer dress. Who cares about the groom?
Pictures from www.style.com.
Comments