second life I, II and III
January just sort of tumbled into February, marked by the Lunar New Year. A few things that happened in the transition.
I)
Sometimes you buy things and they just sit there because you're not sure what to do with them. I bought a tunic last year in Thailand. I knew it was a mistake because I don't wear tunics and it was too short to be a dress, but the blocks of colour were so appealing.
This sounds like a classic mistake, but last week I impulsively picked up my scissors and snipped the bottom off, leaving a small strip of beige behind. The result: a charming "on-trend" colour block t-shirt that brings a welcome change to my repertoire of black and white t-shirts.
Most of the nonsense impulse mistakes are just that: mistakes. But with a little effort, I can sometimes save things from becoming a total waste.
II)
I literally ached for this book, but whenever it popped up on ebay or Amazon, it was always a little too pricey. Just when I was about to take the plunge on a offering on ebay, I gave Amazon one last try, and there it was, a copy marked as "used" going for less than US$50. It carried warnings for possible folded pages and underlining, but I've never minded books in less than mint condition.
It arrived last week, and it was in excellent condition, although the cover was slightly weathered. For me, Peter Lindbergh's brand of gritty glamour defined fashion. The book contains some of the first few fashion pictures I saw that left a deep impression on me. I don't know to whom this booked belonged to and why that someone didn't want it, but on my shelf, it will be treasured once more.
III)
My aunt, who has no daughters, brought out a big box of her costume jewellery for us to plunder when we stayed at her house in Malaysia over the Lunar New Year. Her style is colourful, bold, bohemian, so there were many beautiful beaded pieces we oohed and aahed over but didn't take home. But we did literally strike gold a few times. The quality of her costume jewellery is incredible; they're all in excellent condition, considering the age of some of them, and the clasps and closures all feel very solid.
The deco-Egypto silver and gold necklace has tiny carvings that give the piece depth and texture. The snake-like one also works as a bracelet and is the only piece I see myself wearing. My younger sister rocked the gold link necklace right away - it's perfectly pitched between bold statement piece and Chinese loanshark. The faux-jade bead long necklace went to my mum - it's luminous on skin. The gold knot necklace is our favourite: clean, simple glamour. I was super excited when I saw the triple-strand faux pearl necklace, so very Breakfast at Tiffany's. None of us have figured out a way to wear pearls without looking all dowager-ish though, but they looked fantastic on my mum. And so old things are new again.
I)
Sometimes you buy things and they just sit there because you're not sure what to do with them. I bought a tunic last year in Thailand. I knew it was a mistake because I don't wear tunics and it was too short to be a dress, but the blocks of colour were so appealing.
This sounds like a classic mistake, but last week I impulsively picked up my scissors and snipped the bottom off, leaving a small strip of beige behind. The result: a charming "on-trend" colour block t-shirt that brings a welcome change to my repertoire of black and white t-shirts.
Most of the nonsense impulse mistakes are just that: mistakes. But with a little effort, I can sometimes save things from becoming a total waste.
II)
I literally ached for this book, but whenever it popped up on ebay or Amazon, it was always a little too pricey. Just when I was about to take the plunge on a offering on ebay, I gave Amazon one last try, and there it was, a copy marked as "used" going for less than US$50. It carried warnings for possible folded pages and underlining, but I've never minded books in less than mint condition.
It arrived last week, and it was in excellent condition, although the cover was slightly weathered. For me, Peter Lindbergh's brand of gritty glamour defined fashion. The book contains some of the first few fashion pictures I saw that left a deep impression on me. I don't know to whom this booked belonged to and why that someone didn't want it, but on my shelf, it will be treasured once more.
III)
My aunt, who has no daughters, brought out a big box of her costume jewellery for us to plunder when we stayed at her house in Malaysia over the Lunar New Year. Her style is colourful, bold, bohemian, so there were many beautiful beaded pieces we oohed and aahed over but didn't take home. But we did literally strike gold a few times. The quality of her costume jewellery is incredible; they're all in excellent condition, considering the age of some of them, and the clasps and closures all feel very solid.
The deco-Egypto silver and gold necklace has tiny carvings that give the piece depth and texture. The snake-like one also works as a bracelet and is the only piece I see myself wearing. My younger sister rocked the gold link necklace right away - it's perfectly pitched between bold statement piece and Chinese loanshark. The faux-jade bead long necklace went to my mum - it's luminous on skin. The gold knot necklace is our favourite: clean, simple glamour. I was super excited when I saw the triple-strand faux pearl necklace, so very Breakfast at Tiffany's. None of us have figured out a way to wear pearls without looking all dowager-ish though, but they looked fantastic on my mum. And so old things are new again.
Comments
miss sophie: my aunt is a pretty interesting woman, i definitely need to get those stories out of her!
ammu: what a lovely thing to inherit. i can't wait to wear the snake piece some time actually. when the right mood strikes i suppose.
I have an aunt who is constantly giving fine jewelry away to me and my sister - she keeps saying, oh I never wear these things any more, may as well give it to you young ladies! It kind of makes me sad to hear her say that, but I have yet to refuse anything. Though I doubt I wear the stuff as often as she thinks I do, they are just too precious for subway rides!
http://herribbonsandherbows.blogspot.com/
Great idea about the tunic--it looks great now. Very Rothko-esque.
http://thebohemienne.wordpress.com/
koko: I know what you mean by that sounding sad. At least you can give it new life. Do show some of them on your blog!
Alexandra: I love that shot (actually, that whole editorial) too. I'm looking forward to collecting more books of his work.
The Bohemienne: Yes, my older sister actually looked very elegant in them but she also looked older. Not in a bad way but it's like she became a portrait. We'll have to figure it out...
If Jane: Thanks!
and congratulations on the peter lindbergh book, such a good buy. and i have to agree with you on the development of his work. although i'm afraid that it would be really difficult to pinpoint the reason for it without falling back on clichés. what do you think?
Regards,
Tiffany @ Prayer Necklace
however, in this specific case the visual rhetoric of the photographer seems to have softened up. maybe it is just a question of sticking to his guns? maybe once you have worked out that your signature style is indeed "commercial", you don't want to spoil this specific quality. do you think that this would be just a cliché?